article-time-estimate-icon

3 minute read

Connect the Dots: 10 Ways Lupl’s Workstream Item Linking Unifies Workflows

Ab Saraswat

Ab Saraswat

In this article

    The constant need to jump between documents, deadline trackers, and email disrupts focus and increases the likelihood of missing details and incoming action items. Tasks like cross referencing issue trackers, searching for a critical source document for reference, or verifying deadlines, are distractions that add up and significantly slow down progress. 
     
    Lupl’s Workstream Item Linking solves these challenges by providing a way to build a cohesive and interconnected workflow that reduces friction and context switching. Instead of navigating through multiple systems or losing momentum as you search for information or draft notes, everything you need is just a click away, right where you’re already working. 

    Here are 10 ways to leverage this feature to design a more cohesive workflow: 

    1. Connecting Witnesses/Experts/Consultants with Issues/Claims/Counterclaims 

    Create one workstream listing all witnesses, experts, and consultants involved in your case. In a separate workstream, track issues, claims, and counterclaims. By linking the relevant witnesses or experts to each item in the issues workstream, you ensure that all associated parties are clearly identified. This helps in quickly referencing who is involved with each issue, making it easier to prepare for discussions or legal proceedings. 

    2. Synchronizing Witness Availability with Deposition Dates 

    Set up a workstream with witness names and another with potential deposition dates. Link each witness to the dates they are available. This makes scheduling more efficient and ensures that all parties are aligned on availability, reducing the back-and-forth often associated with setting deposition dates. 

    3. Aligning Due Diligence Investigations with Material Issues/Red Flags 

    When conducting due diligence, create a workstream listing all areas under investigation. In another workstream, track potential material issues or red flags. Link these issues directly to the relevant sections of the investigation. This linkage helps keep the due diligence focused and ensures that no critical red flags are overlooked during the investigation process. 

    4. Linking Target Companies with Regulatory/Compliance Requirements in M&A Transactions 

    In an M&A transaction, one workstream can list all target companies, while another tracks the specific regulatory approvals or compliance requirements for each jurisdiction. Linking the companies to the relevant regulatory items ensures that all legal and compliance issues are addressed for each target, reducing the risk of oversight. 

    5. Tying Evidence/Documents to Legal Issues or Defenses 

    During legal disputes, maintain one workstream for all evidence and documents collected, and another for the legal issues or defenses being pursued. Linking the evidence to the relevant legal issues helps in building a coherent case, ensuring that all supporting documents are readily accessible when needed. 

    6. Connecting Arbitration Process Steps with Related Tasks 

    Outline the arbitration process and related procedural rules in one workstream. In another, list the tasks that need to be completed during the arbitration. By linking the tasks to the relevant stage of the process, you provide quick access to the rules and procedure notes, ensuring that each task is completed correctly and on time. 

    7. Associating Documents with Parties in the Execution Process 

    Create a workstream listing all documents that need to be executed and another listing key information for all parties involved. Link the documents to the parties who need to execute them, making it easy to track which documents are pending and who is responsible for each one. 

    8. Matching Estate Assets and Liabilities with Interested Parties 

    In estate administration, maintain one workstream for all assets and liabilities and another for heirs and interested parties. Link the assets and liabilities to the parties with a confirmed interest. This ensures transparency and helps in resolving any disputes over ownership or interest in the estate. 

    9. Coordinating Milestone Dates with Action Items 

    Track important milestone dates in one workstream and corresponding action items in another. Link each date to the tasks that need to be completed by then. This ensures that all team members are aware of upcoming deadlines and what needs to be done, improving overall project management. 

    10. Creating a Hierarchical Structure for Complex Projects 

    For complex projects that involve multiple layers of tasks and responsibilities, you can use workstreams to impose a clear hierarchy on your workflow. Create a workstream for the higher-level “umbrella” tasks and link it to other workstreams that detail the specific tasks or categories under it. This approach allows you to manage large, multifaceted projects by clearly organizing tasks into a structured and logical flow, ensuring that each part of the project is accounted for and properly managed. 

    Conclusion 

    Lupl’s Workstream Item Linking feature is more than just a way to organize tasks—it’s a method for integrating the full complexity of legal work into a single, manageable system. By linking related workstream items, you can create a seamless workflow that mirrors the interdependencies of your legal projects, reducing the risk of oversight and making your processes more efficient. Whether you’re dealing with intricate litigation, transaction management, or estate administration, this feature provides the flexibility and control you need to stay ahead in your work.  

    In this article

      More legal tech insights we think you'll love

      The cost of over-dependence on AI

      AI saves us time, boosts productivity, and lets us do...

      # Lupl Workstream Design Principles: A Practical Guide to Legal Project Management for Lawyers Legal project management works when your setup is simple, ownership is clear, and statuses are unambiguous. This guide shows how to turn existing processes and checklists into a lean, reliable Workstream. Lupl is the legal project management platform for law firms, making it easy and intuitive to apply these principles. It also supports moving your work from Excel, Word tables, or if you are transitioning from Microsoft Planner, Smartsheet, or Monday. You will learn what belongs in a Workstream, a Task, or a Step, and which columns to use. If you want practical project management for lawyers, start here. **Excerpt:** Legal project management works when ownership, dates, and statuses are clear. This guide shows lawyers how to turn checklists into Lupl Workstreams with the right columns, Tasks, and Steps. Use it to standardize project management for lawyers, reduce follow ups, and move matters to done. --- ## How to organize your work with Workstreams, Tasks, and Steps Workstreams, Tasks, and Steps are three different types of objects in Lupl. They form a simple hierarchy. Workstreams contain Tasks. Tasks may contain optional Steps. This hierarchy aligns with standard project management. In project management, you break work into projects, deliverables, and subtasks. Lupl adapts this for lawyers by using Workstreams, Tasks, and Steps. This makes it easier to map legal processes to a structure that teams can track and manage. * **Workstream.** Use when you have many similar or related items to track over time. Think of the Workstream as the table. * Examples: closing checklist, court deadlines, pretrial preparation, regulatory obligations, due diligence, local counsel management. * **Task.** A high level unit of legal work. A key deliverable with an owner and a due date. Tasks are the rows. * Examples: File motion. Prepare Shareholder Agreement. Submit Q3 report. * **Step.** An optional short checklist inside a single Task. Steps roll up to the parent Task. * Examples: Draft. QC. Partner review. E file. Serve. ### Quick test * If it can be overdue by itself, make it a Task. * If it only helps complete a Task, make it a Step. * If you need different columns or owners, create a separate Workstream. --- ## Do you need to track everything in Lupl Not every detail needs to be tracked in a project management system. The principle is to capture what drives accountability and progress. In Lupl, that means focusing on deliverables, not every micro action. * Use the level of detail you would bring to a weekly team meeting agenda. * Position Tasks as key deliverables. Treat Steps as optional micro tasks to show progress. * Example: You need client instructions. Do not add a Task for "Email client to request a call." Just make the call. If the client approves a key deliverable on the call, mark that item Approved in Lupl so the team has visibility. --- ## Start with the Core 5 columns Columns are the backbone of a Workstream. They define what information is tracked for each Task. In project management terms, these are your core metadata fields. They keep everyone aligned without overcomplicating the table. Keep the table narrow. You can add later. These five work across most legal project management use cases. 1. **Title.** Start with a verb. Example: File answer to complaint. 2. **Status.** Five to seven clear choices. Example: Not started, In progress, For review, For approval, Done. 3. **Assignee.** One named owner per row. If you add multiple assignees for collaboration, still name a primary owner. 4. **Due date.** One date per row. 5. **Type or Category.** Show different kinds of work in one table. Example: Filing, Discovery, Signature, Approval. **Priority.** Add only if you actively triage by priority each week. If added, keep it simple: High, Medium, Low. --- ## Add up to three Helper columns Lupl includes a set of pre made columns you can use out of the box. These allow you to customize Workstreams around different phases or stages of a matter. They also let you map how you already track transactional work, litigation, or other processes. Helper columns are optional fields that add context. In task management, these are similar to tags or attributes you use to sort and filter work. The key is to only add what you will update and use. Pick only what you will use. Stop when you reach three. * Party or Counterparty * Jurisdiction or Court * Phase * Approver * Approval, status or yes or no * Signature status * Risk, RAG * Amount or Number * External ID or Client ID * Document or Link * Docket number * Client entity **Guidance** * For Task Workstreams, prefer Approver, Approval, Risk. The rest are more common in Custom Workstreams. * Aim for eight columns or fewer in your main table. Put detail in the Task description, attachments, or Steps. --- ## Simple rules that keep your table clean Consistency is critical in project management. A cluttered or inconsistent table slows teams down. These rules ensure your Workstream remains usable and clear. * Only add a column people will update during the matter. If it never changes, set a default at the Workstream level or set a default value in the column. * Only add a column you will sort or filter on. If you will not use it to find or group work, leave it out. * If a value changes inside one Task, use Steps. Steps show progress without widening the table. * Keep columns short and structured. Use Description for brief context or instructions. Use Task comments for discussion and decisions. Link to work product in your DMS as the source of truth. * One accountable owner per Task and one due date. You can add collaborators, but always name a primary owner who moves the Task. If different people or dates apply to different parts, split into separate Tasks or capture the handoff as Steps. * Add automations after you lock the design. Finalize columns and status definitions first. Then add simple reminders and escalations that read those fields. --- ## Status hygiene that everyone understands Status is the single most important column in project management. It tells the team where the work stands. Too many options cause confusion. Too few cause misalignment. In Lupl, keep it simple and consistent. * Five to seven statuses are enough. * Use one review gate, For review or For approval. Use both only if your process needs two gates. * One terminal status, Done. This is the end state of the Task. Use Archived only if you report on it or need it for retention workflows. --- ## When to split into multiple Workstreams In project management, it is best practice to separate workstreams when workflows, owners, or audiences diverge. Lupl makes this easy by letting you create multiple Workstreams for one matter. Create a new Workstream if any of the following are true. * You need a different set of columns for a chunk of work. * Ownership or cadence is different, for example daily docketing vs monthly reporting. * The audience or confidentiality needs are different. **Signal** * If half your rows leave several columns blank, you are mixing processes. Split the table. --- ## Decision tree, three quick questions Use this quick framework to decide where an item belongs. This is the same principle used in task management software, adapted for legal workflows. 1. Is this a list of similar items over time, or a discrete phase of the matter * Yes. Create a Workstream. 2. Can it be overdue by itself, and does it need an owner * Yes. Create a Task. 3. Is it a step to finish a Task and not tracked on its own * Yes. Create a Step. --- ## Common mistakes to avoid Many project management failures come from overdesigning or misusing the structure. Avoid these mistakes to keep your Workstreams lean and effective. * Wide tables with many optional columns. Keep it to eight or fewer. * Two columns for the same idea, for example Status and Phase that overlap. Merge or define clearly. * More than one approval gate when one would do. It slows work and confuses owners. * Mixing unrelated processes in one table, for example signatures and invoice approvals. --- ## Build your first Workstream Building a Workstream is like setting up a project board. Keep it light, pilot it, then refine. Lupl is designed to let you do this quickly without heavy admin work. 1. Write the Workstream purpose in one sentence. 2. Add the Core 5 columns. 3. Add at most three Helpers you will use. 4. Define clear Status meanings in plain words. 5. Set defaults for any value that repeats on most rows, for example Jurisdiction. 6. Add two light automations, a due soon reminder and an overdue nudge. 7. Pilot for one week and adjust. --- ## Where this fits in legal project management Use these principles to standardize project management for lawyers across matters. Keep structures consistent. Reuse column sets and status definitions. Your team will find work faster, reduce follow ups, and close loops on time. --- ### On page SEO helpers * Suggested title tag. Lupl Workstream Design Principles, Practical Legal Project Management for Lawyers * Suggested meta description. Learn how to design lean Lupl Workstreams for legal project management. Get clear rules for Tasks, Steps, statuses, and columns to run matters with confidence. * Suggested URL slug. legal-project-management-for-lawyers-workstream-design

      Lupl Workstream Design Principles: A Practical Guide to Legal Project Management for Lawyers

      Learn why large‑firm lawyers are ditching Excel checklists for dynamic,...

      Do AI Agents Have An Identity? Notes from InfoSec Discussions

      Agentic AI is in its early phases but advancing fast....