article-time-estimate-icon

4 minute read

Key Selling Points for Pitching Legal Project Management Software

Ab Saraswat

Ab Saraswat

Selling Points for Legal Project Management
In this article

    In the ever-evolving landscape of legal practice, staying ahead requires more than just exceptional legal skills. It demands efficient management of projects, tasks, and teams. This is where legal project management software emerges as a transformative tool, increasing efficiency, improving collaboration, and revolutionizing the way law firms operate.

    However, it can be difficult to garner the support of senior lawyers without the right tech. For legal project managers aiming to garner partner support for adopting such software, here are key selling points to focus on:

    Security, Privacy, and Compliance

    In an era dominated by increasing data breaches and privacy concerns, company leaders are placing a growing emphasis on ensuring data security. Legal project management software that prioritizes security features will ensure that client data and sensitive documents remain secure. Sector-grade encryption protocols, regular penetration testing, access control, and compliance with industry standards guarantee that your firm's data remains confidential and comprehensively protected from unauthorized access.

    When engaging with your law firm's Chief Information Officer, emphasize the software's alignment with its IT strategy. Showcase its role in seamlessly integrating with the existing security infrastructure. Highlight its unwavering commitment to encryption, regular security audits, and compliance with industry regulations. Present the software as a forward-looking solution that bolsters the firm's data protection strategy, thus garnering the Chief Information Officer's endorsement for its incorporation.

    Streamlined Collaboration

    Commonly in legal practice, there are too many different types of systems that can’t be used together, resulting in disjointed, stop-start communication. This fragmentation hampers the flow of work and impedes cohesive collaboration. Legal project management software is a solution to this problem, consolidating all collaborative efforts into a single, centralized workspace. This eliminates the hassle of juggling multiple communication channels and tools, fostering seamless collaboration among attorneys, paralegals, and support staff. Partners will appreciate how this boosts productivity and accountability across the board.

    As you discuss the benefits of LPM with your Chief Knowledge Officer and partners, tailor the conversation about collaboration benefits to resonate with their strategic goals. Highlight how the software's unified workspace aligns with the firm's knowledge management objectives, facilitating streamlined communication and knowledge sharing. Emphasize how this consolidation minimizes inefficiencies and time wastage caused by disjointed systems. Frame it as a tool that enhances cross-departmental collaboration and accelerates decision-making. This alignment with the firm's vision for efficient knowledge management and improved client service boosts the likelihood of gaining their support.

    Eliminating Unnecessary Workflows

    Legal operations often involve repetitive tasks and workflows that can be time-consuming and prone to errors. Introducing legal project management software allows you to identify and eliminate unnecessary workflows, improving efficiency and resource allocation. As a result, you have more time to deliver the outstanding legal support that your clients expect. Demonstrating how this technology reduces redundant efforts can significantly sway partners in favor of its adoption.

    When discussing workflow optimization benefits with your Chief Knowledge Officer and partners, emphasize the software's potential to align with the firm's knowledge management strategy. Point out how the software's workflow analysis can uncover areas of improvement, enhancing knowledge sharing and process refinement. Frame it as a tool that empowers the firm to deliver exceptional legal services by focusing efforts on high-value tasks. Highlight the software's data-driven insights that facilitate informed decision-making for resource allocation and strategic planning.

    Cross-Team Project Management

    Managing tasks across different teams can be a daunting challenge in a fast-paced legal practice due to the various moving parts in a complex legal project. Fortunately, legal project management software offers integrated task management features that empower legal project managers to assign, track, and prioritize tasks across teams. Partners will value how this feature streamlines communication, minimizes misunderstandings and ensures projects move forward smoothly.

    When approaching your Chief Information Officer and partners, present the cross-team project management benefits as a strategic asset that enhances operational efficiency. Highlight how the software aligns with the firm's IT vision by simplifying task assignments and progress tracking across diverse teams. Emphasize how the feature accelerates decision-making by minimizing communication gaps and enabling real-time project oversight. Frame it as a tool that not only fosters collaboration but also aligns with the firm's commitment to client satisfaction through seamless project execution.

    Easy Implementation Process

    One concern often voiced when adopting Legal Tech is the potential disruption it might cause. However, implementing a new legal project management software can be easy and swift with an organized strategy, the right team, and ready users. This involves preparing lawyers to be involved from the outset, assuring them that the adoption solves a core business need. This assurance of a smooth transition can alleviate any reservations partners might have about integrating new software into the firm's workflow.

    When discussing the seamless implementation process with your Chief Information Officer and partners, highlight how it aligns with the firm's IT strategy. Explain the steps involved, including involving lawyers from the outset, and how the software's user-friendly interface facilitates rapid adoption. Illustrate how the process minimizes disruption and emphasizes solving core business needs. Present it as a proactive approach that minimizes interruptions and enhances the firm's operational efficiency.

    Real-Time Project Visibility

    Ensure partners that they will be able to access immediate snapshots of project progress, eliminating the need for time-consuming updates. This enhanced visibility transforms client interactions, enabling confident responses about case status and promoting client satisfaction. Furthermore, it empowers partners to make agile, informed decisions, preventing delays and ensuring projects remain on course.

    When addressing the significance of real-time project visibility with your firm's partners, underline the immediate impact on client relations. Emphasize how this capability enhances transparency by providing partners with real-time insights into project progress. Highlight how partners can confidently engage with clients, offering accurate updates without delays or uncertainties. Illustrate how real-time visibility allows for swift interventions to prevent any potential issues, thereby reinforcing the firm's commitment to delivering excellence. Frame it as a proactive measure that benefits internal operations and strengthens the firm's reputation for reliability and client-centric service.

    Conclusion

    In the fast-paced realm of legal project management, the journey from vision to execution is rife with challenges. However, armed with the compelling benefits of legal project management software, you, as a legal project manager, have the tools to transform these challenges into opportunities. By embracing this technology's security, collaboration, workflow optimization, and cross-team capabilities, you're poised to elevate your firm's operational efficiency and client satisfaction. As you step into the realm of advocating for software adoption, remember to tailor your pitch to align with the strategic objectives of your firm's decision-makers. Unveil the vision of a unified workspace, the promise of efficient knowledge sharing, and the potential to streamline communication gaps. With a keen focus on these selling points, paired with a smooth implementation plan that respects core business needs, you're prepared to usher in a new era of legal project management excellence. The future of your firm's success lies in your hands, guided by the transformative power of legal project management software.

    Are you interested in legal project management software? Get a firsthand look at Lupl’s revolutionary software and book a demo today.

    In this article

      More legal tech insights we think you'll love

      The cost of over-dependence on AI

      AI saves us time, boosts productivity, and lets us do...

      # Lupl Workstream Design Principles: A Practical Guide to Legal Project Management for Lawyers Legal project management works when your setup is simple, ownership is clear, and statuses are unambiguous. This guide shows how to turn existing processes and checklists into a lean, reliable Workstream. Lupl is the legal project management platform for law firms, making it easy and intuitive to apply these principles. It also supports moving your work from Excel, Word tables, or if you are transitioning from Microsoft Planner, Smartsheet, or Monday. You will learn what belongs in a Workstream, a Task, or a Step, and which columns to use. If you want practical project management for lawyers, start here. **Excerpt:** Legal project management works when ownership, dates, and statuses are clear. This guide shows lawyers how to turn checklists into Lupl Workstreams with the right columns, Tasks, and Steps. Use it to standardize project management for lawyers, reduce follow ups, and move matters to done. --- ## How to organize your work with Workstreams, Tasks, and Steps Workstreams, Tasks, and Steps are three different types of objects in Lupl. They form a simple hierarchy. Workstreams contain Tasks. Tasks may contain optional Steps. This hierarchy aligns with standard project management. In project management, you break work into projects, deliverables, and subtasks. Lupl adapts this for lawyers by using Workstreams, Tasks, and Steps. This makes it easier to map legal processes to a structure that teams can track and manage. * **Workstream.** Use when you have many similar or related items to track over time. Think of the Workstream as the table. * Examples: closing checklist, court deadlines, pretrial preparation, regulatory obligations, due diligence, local counsel management. * **Task.** A high level unit of legal work. A key deliverable with an owner and a due date. Tasks are the rows. * Examples: File motion. Prepare Shareholder Agreement. Submit Q3 report. * **Step.** An optional short checklist inside a single Task. Steps roll up to the parent Task. * Examples: Draft. QC. Partner review. E file. Serve. ### Quick test * If it can be overdue by itself, make it a Task. * If it only helps complete a Task, make it a Step. * If you need different columns or owners, create a separate Workstream. --- ## Do you need to track everything in Lupl Not every detail needs to be tracked in a project management system. The principle is to capture what drives accountability and progress. In Lupl, that means focusing on deliverables, not every micro action. * Use the level of detail you would bring to a weekly team meeting agenda. * Position Tasks as key deliverables. Treat Steps as optional micro tasks to show progress. * Example: You need client instructions. Do not add a Task for "Email client to request a call." Just make the call. If the client approves a key deliverable on the call, mark that item Approved in Lupl so the team has visibility. --- ## Start with the Core 5 columns Columns are the backbone of a Workstream. They define what information is tracked for each Task. In project management terms, these are your core metadata fields. They keep everyone aligned without overcomplicating the table. Keep the table narrow. You can add later. These five work across most legal project management use cases. 1. **Title.** Start with a verb. Example: File answer to complaint. 2. **Status.** Five to seven clear choices. Example: Not started, In progress, For review, For approval, Done. 3. **Assignee.** One named owner per row. If you add multiple assignees for collaboration, still name a primary owner. 4. **Due date.** One date per row. 5. **Type or Category.** Show different kinds of work in one table. Example: Filing, Discovery, Signature, Approval. **Priority.** Add only if you actively triage by priority each week. If added, keep it simple: High, Medium, Low. --- ## Add up to three Helper columns Lupl includes a set of pre made columns you can use out of the box. These allow you to customize Workstreams around different phases or stages of a matter. They also let you map how you already track transactional work, litigation, or other processes. Helper columns are optional fields that add context. In task management, these are similar to tags or attributes you use to sort and filter work. The key is to only add what you will update and use. Pick only what you will use. Stop when you reach three. * Party or Counterparty * Jurisdiction or Court * Phase * Approver * Approval, status or yes or no * Signature status * Risk, RAG * Amount or Number * External ID or Client ID * Document or Link * Docket number * Client entity **Guidance** * For Task Workstreams, prefer Approver, Approval, Risk. The rest are more common in Custom Workstreams. * Aim for eight columns or fewer in your main table. Put detail in the Task description, attachments, or Steps. --- ## Simple rules that keep your table clean Consistency is critical in project management. A cluttered or inconsistent table slows teams down. These rules ensure your Workstream remains usable and clear. * Only add a column people will update during the matter. If it never changes, set a default at the Workstream level or set a default value in the column. * Only add a column you will sort or filter on. If you will not use it to find or group work, leave it out. * If a value changes inside one Task, use Steps. Steps show progress without widening the table. * Keep columns short and structured. Use Description for brief context or instructions. Use Task comments for discussion and decisions. Link to work product in your DMS as the source of truth. * One accountable owner per Task and one due date. You can add collaborators, but always name a primary owner who moves the Task. If different people or dates apply to different parts, split into separate Tasks or capture the handoff as Steps. * Add automations after you lock the design. Finalize columns and status definitions first. Then add simple reminders and escalations that read those fields. --- ## Status hygiene that everyone understands Status is the single most important column in project management. It tells the team where the work stands. Too many options cause confusion. Too few cause misalignment. In Lupl, keep it simple and consistent. * Five to seven statuses are enough. * Use one review gate, For review or For approval. Use both only if your process needs two gates. * One terminal status, Done. This is the end state of the Task. Use Archived only if you report on it or need it for retention workflows. --- ## When to split into multiple Workstreams In project management, it is best practice to separate workstreams when workflows, owners, or audiences diverge. Lupl makes this easy by letting you create multiple Workstreams for one matter. Create a new Workstream if any of the following are true. * You need a different set of columns for a chunk of work. * Ownership or cadence is different, for example daily docketing vs monthly reporting. * The audience or confidentiality needs are different. **Signal** * If half your rows leave several columns blank, you are mixing processes. Split the table. --- ## Decision tree, three quick questions Use this quick framework to decide where an item belongs. This is the same principle used in task management software, adapted for legal workflows. 1. Is this a list of similar items over time, or a discrete phase of the matter * Yes. Create a Workstream. 2. Can it be overdue by itself, and does it need an owner * Yes. Create a Task. 3. Is it a step to finish a Task and not tracked on its own * Yes. Create a Step. --- ## Common mistakes to avoid Many project management failures come from overdesigning or misusing the structure. Avoid these mistakes to keep your Workstreams lean and effective. * Wide tables with many optional columns. Keep it to eight or fewer. * Two columns for the same idea, for example Status and Phase that overlap. Merge or define clearly. * More than one approval gate when one would do. It slows work and confuses owners. * Mixing unrelated processes in one table, for example signatures and invoice approvals. --- ## Build your first Workstream Building a Workstream is like setting up a project board. Keep it light, pilot it, then refine. Lupl is designed to let you do this quickly without heavy admin work. 1. Write the Workstream purpose in one sentence. 2. Add the Core 5 columns. 3. Add at most three Helpers you will use. 4. Define clear Status meanings in plain words. 5. Set defaults for any value that repeats on most rows, for example Jurisdiction. 6. Add two light automations, a due soon reminder and an overdue nudge. 7. Pilot for one week and adjust. --- ## Where this fits in legal project management Use these principles to standardize project management for lawyers across matters. Keep structures consistent. Reuse column sets and status definitions. Your team will find work faster, reduce follow ups, and close loops on time. --- ### On page SEO helpers * Suggested title tag. Lupl Workstream Design Principles, Practical Legal Project Management for Lawyers * Suggested meta description. Learn how to design lean Lupl Workstreams for legal project management. Get clear rules for Tasks, Steps, statuses, and columns to run matters with confidence. * Suggested URL slug. legal-project-management-for-lawyers-workstream-design

      Lupl Workstream Design Principles: A Practical Guide to Legal Project Management for Lawyers

      Learn why large‑firm lawyers are ditching Excel checklists for dynamic,...

      Do AI Agents Have An Identity? Notes from InfoSec Discussions

      Agentic AI is in its early phases but advancing fast....