article-time-estimate-icon

5 minute read

How Lupl Enables Efficient Matter Management

Ab Saraswat

Ab Saraswat

Streamlining Legal Work
In this article

    LexMundi hosts frequent meetings for their member firms to keep them abreast of leading legal technologies and how they might impact the delivery of legal service. Lupl was invited to deliver a session to the LexMundi member firms on the benefits of legal project management, enabling effective delivery of legal service and improving the client experience. The article below is the summary of takeaways from that session.

    Lawyers today rely heavily on generic tools like email, Word, and Excel to manage their matters. While these applications have their place, they can create inefficiencies when used for complex legal project management. As India Preston, Director of Platform Solutions at Lupl, points out in a recent webinar, over 75% of lawyers are managing deals predominantly using these basic programs.

    Built specifically for legal teams, Lupl provides a sophisticated yet user-friendly platform enabling seamless collaboration, task tracking, and visibility into matters. As Rajesh Sreenivasan, partner at Rajah & Tann Asia, shares from his firm's experience, Lupl overcomes many pain points lawyers encounter when trying to wrangle all the moving parts of client work.

    The Challenges with Current Tools

    India explains that while tools like email and Word "certainly weren't designed exclusively with lawyers in mind and were never meant for project management," most legal teams rely on them anyway to manage their matters. This makes everything harder than necessary and introduces problems including:

    • Decentralized task management: "It's really hard to know exactly where things are at a given time if there isn't a central place to turn to."
    • Lack of visibility: "Matter managers and clients all require visibility, but there are very few solutions out there to provide insight." Providing updates manually creates extra work.
    • Difficulty collaborating: "There are lots of different channels, different organizations each with different requirements."
    • No embedded best practices: "Often there isn't any practice of picking up knowledge and gaining your learnings at the end of one matter that you can then share with your colleagues."

    As Rajesh articulates regarding the resulting inefficiencies, "Everywhere means nowhere as far as matter management is concerned." He adds that in today's digital world, "You cannot tell lawyers to stop using these platforms. But at the same time, we need to find a way in which you could bring some degree of control."

    What is Lupl and How Can It Benefit Legal Teams?

    At its core, Lupl gives legal teams a central place to manage their matters from start to finish. India demonstrates key features including:

    • Task management with assignees, due dates, priorities, and status
    • Email syncing directly into matters
    • Document management integration with systems like NetDocuments and iManage
    • Reusable templates that standardize repeatable work
    • Matter-centric communication channels
    • At-a-glance matter dashboards

    India explains that Lupl aims to provide "every lawyer with simple, easy to use legal project management functionality that raises the skill of the legal workforce in delivering client matters in an organized, collaborative and much more visible way."

    For lawyers accustomed to toggling between Outlook, network drives, and spreadsheets, Lupl brings everything together in one place. As Rajesh says, Lupl offers "a single platform where you can chat, share notes amongst the team members and have all your emails accessible and the documents properly accessible. Some people call it a 360 view of your matter. That is priceless to us."

    This consolidation eliminates redundant data entry, reduces searching, and provides both lawyers and clients visibility into matter status. As India explains, "Your inbox is not a project management tool." Purpose-built legal technology like Lupl allows legal teams to work collaboratively and efficiently.

    Adoption Strategies for Law Firms

    While Lupl aims to simplify legal project management, convincing lawyers to change tools can still present challenges. Rajesh at Rajah & Tann Asia offers real-world perspectives on driving adoption at law firms based on his experience championing Lupl internally:

    • Start with the problem, not the technology. Rajesh highlights two key problems Lupl solves for his firm: restoring control over client communications and enabling seamless collaboration and matter management. Understanding pain points helps secure buy-in.
    • Pick the right matters. Rajesh notes that Lupl may not be suitable for every matter, but firms should encourage its use wherever possible. He focuses initial rollout on appropriate matter types like cross-border transactions and insolvency cases.
    • Leverage templates for training. For insolvency matters, Rajesh transferred an existing checklist into Lupl as a template. This simultaneously trains new lawyers on processes while reinforcing best practices through task completion.As Rajesh explains, "Rather than have another junior lawyer sit down and say, okay, first you're going to take this document, you're going to tell the investing company I received it. Set a timeline, review the document, reach out back to the investing company and say, look guys, we're on it. All of that is set up in a checklist and the lawyers can just go down and make sure that they've done everything."
    • Show the 360-degree view. For one client with 20+ subsidiaries, Rajesh created a single Lupl matter linking folders for each subsidiary. This "single source of truth" helped demonstrate Lupl's power to provide a complete picture of complex matters.
    • Start small, then expand. When launching Lupl, Rajesh recommends starting with a few dedicated power users and incrementally rolling out from there, allowing organic adoption based on visible benefits.
    • Facilitate cross-border collaboration. Rajesh explains that when dealing with regional matters, Lupl makes it easy to bring in lawyers from different offices and countries. He notes, "It actually makes it more seamless, and you don't feel that you're dealing with someone in another country."

    While shifting ingrained work habits takes time, Lupl's flexibility supports customized deployment strategies suited to each firm's needs. As Rajesh summarizes, "The advantages of being able to have everything in one place; it's something that becomes very self-apparent to our lawyers very quickly."

    With purpose-built legal technology like Lupl, legal teams can transform efficiency and transparency across their matters, delivering better experiences for lawyers and clients alike. As India concludes, "It should be a mission on every law firm's agenda to put suitable project management tools in the hands of all your lawyers."

    Take your legal project management to the next level with Lupl – Request a demo today!

    About Lupl

    Lupl allows legal professionals to effortlessly move work forward. Lupl is a legal project management tool with built-in collaboration features to allow legal teams to deliver on time and budget.

    Lupl was an idea spun into action after hundreds of hours of conversations with people from legal departments and law firms across the world. We found that common pain points exist and disrupt workflow no matter where lawyers practice.

    Fast forward to today, and after countless more hours in co-development with our global community, Lupl has evolved into the solution to help transform how lawyers, clients and other legal professionals work together. And we’ll continue to adapt to the ever-changing needs of the legal services market.

    About LexMundi

    Lex Mundi is the world’s leading network of independent law firms, uniting top legal expertise from various jurisdictions to deliver world-class cross-border legal solutions.

    Lex Mundi’s reach spans over 100 countries, providing clients access to high quality legal support worldwide. Through a culture of collaboration and continuous learning, this firm empowers its member firms to remain at the forefront of legal innovation, ensuring clients receive effective and efficient legal services tailored to their unique needs.

    With an unwavering commitment to excellence, LexMundi is a trusted partner for businesses and individuals seeking international legal expertise, offering reliable strategic counsel and delivering exceptional outcomes across a diverse practice areas.

    About Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP

    Rajah & Tann Singapore is one of the largest full-service law firms in Singapore and Southeast Asia. The firm has been at the leading edge of law in Asia, having worked on many of the biggest and highest profile matters in the region.

    Rajah & Tann Singapore is a member firm of Rajah & Tann Asia. Launched in 2014, it is one of the largest regional networks that brings together leading law firms and over 800 fee earners across ten jurisdictions. The firm’s reach also includes Singapore based regional desks focusing on Brunei, Japan and South Asia. As the Singapore member firm of the Lex Mundi Network, the firm is able to offer clients access to legal support in over 100 countries around the globe.

    In this article

      More legal tech insights we think you'll love

      The cost of over-dependence on AI

      AI saves us time, boosts productivity, and lets us do...

      # Lupl Workstream Design Principles: A Practical Guide to Legal Project Management for Lawyers Legal project management works when your setup is simple, ownership is clear, and statuses are unambiguous. This guide shows how to turn existing processes and checklists into a lean, reliable Workstream. Lupl is the legal project management platform for law firms, making it easy and intuitive to apply these principles. It also supports moving your work from Excel, Word tables, or if you are transitioning from Microsoft Planner, Smartsheet, or Monday. You will learn what belongs in a Workstream, a Task, or a Step, and which columns to use. If you want practical project management for lawyers, start here. **Excerpt:** Legal project management works when ownership, dates, and statuses are clear. This guide shows lawyers how to turn checklists into Lupl Workstreams with the right columns, Tasks, and Steps. Use it to standardize project management for lawyers, reduce follow ups, and move matters to done. --- ## How to organize your work with Workstreams, Tasks, and Steps Workstreams, Tasks, and Steps are three different types of objects in Lupl. They form a simple hierarchy. Workstreams contain Tasks. Tasks may contain optional Steps. This hierarchy aligns with standard project management. In project management, you break work into projects, deliverables, and subtasks. Lupl adapts this for lawyers by using Workstreams, Tasks, and Steps. This makes it easier to map legal processes to a structure that teams can track and manage. * **Workstream.** Use when you have many similar or related items to track over time. Think of the Workstream as the table. * Examples: closing checklist, court deadlines, pretrial preparation, regulatory obligations, due diligence, local counsel management. * **Task.** A high level unit of legal work. A key deliverable with an owner and a due date. Tasks are the rows. * Examples: File motion. Prepare Shareholder Agreement. Submit Q3 report. * **Step.** An optional short checklist inside a single Task. Steps roll up to the parent Task. * Examples: Draft. QC. Partner review. E file. Serve. ### Quick test * If it can be overdue by itself, make it a Task. * If it only helps complete a Task, make it a Step. * If you need different columns or owners, create a separate Workstream. --- ## Do you need to track everything in Lupl Not every detail needs to be tracked in a project management system. The principle is to capture what drives accountability and progress. In Lupl, that means focusing on deliverables, not every micro action. * Use the level of detail you would bring to a weekly team meeting agenda. * Position Tasks as key deliverables. Treat Steps as optional micro tasks to show progress. * Example: You need client instructions. Do not add a Task for "Email client to request a call." Just make the call. If the client approves a key deliverable on the call, mark that item Approved in Lupl so the team has visibility. --- ## Start with the Core 5 columns Columns are the backbone of a Workstream. They define what information is tracked for each Task. In project management terms, these are your core metadata fields. They keep everyone aligned without overcomplicating the table. Keep the table narrow. You can add later. These five work across most legal project management use cases. 1. **Title.** Start with a verb. Example: File answer to complaint. 2. **Status.** Five to seven clear choices. Example: Not started, In progress, For review, For approval, Done. 3. **Assignee.** One named owner per row. If you add multiple assignees for collaboration, still name a primary owner. 4. **Due date.** One date per row. 5. **Type or Category.** Show different kinds of work in one table. Example: Filing, Discovery, Signature, Approval. **Priority.** Add only if you actively triage by priority each week. If added, keep it simple: High, Medium, Low. --- ## Add up to three Helper columns Lupl includes a set of pre made columns you can use out of the box. These allow you to customize Workstreams around different phases or stages of a matter. They also let you map how you already track transactional work, litigation, or other processes. Helper columns are optional fields that add context. In task management, these are similar to tags or attributes you use to sort and filter work. The key is to only add what you will update and use. Pick only what you will use. Stop when you reach three. * Party or Counterparty * Jurisdiction or Court * Phase * Approver * Approval, status or yes or no * Signature status * Risk, RAG * Amount or Number * External ID or Client ID * Document or Link * Docket number * Client entity **Guidance** * For Task Workstreams, prefer Approver, Approval, Risk. The rest are more common in Custom Workstreams. * Aim for eight columns or fewer in your main table. Put detail in the Task description, attachments, or Steps. --- ## Simple rules that keep your table clean Consistency is critical in project management. A cluttered or inconsistent table slows teams down. These rules ensure your Workstream remains usable and clear. * Only add a column people will update during the matter. If it never changes, set a default at the Workstream level or set a default value in the column. * Only add a column you will sort or filter on. If you will not use it to find or group work, leave it out. * If a value changes inside one Task, use Steps. Steps show progress without widening the table. * Keep columns short and structured. Use Description for brief context or instructions. Use Task comments for discussion and decisions. Link to work product in your DMS as the source of truth. * One accountable owner per Task and one due date. You can add collaborators, but always name a primary owner who moves the Task. If different people or dates apply to different parts, split into separate Tasks or capture the handoff as Steps. * Add automations after you lock the design. Finalize columns and status definitions first. Then add simple reminders and escalations that read those fields. --- ## Status hygiene that everyone understands Status is the single most important column in project management. It tells the team where the work stands. Too many options cause confusion. Too few cause misalignment. In Lupl, keep it simple and consistent. * Five to seven statuses are enough. * Use one review gate, For review or For approval. Use both only if your process needs two gates. * One terminal status, Done. This is the end state of the Task. Use Archived only if you report on it or need it for retention workflows. --- ## When to split into multiple Workstreams In project management, it is best practice to separate workstreams when workflows, owners, or audiences diverge. Lupl makes this easy by letting you create multiple Workstreams for one matter. Create a new Workstream if any of the following are true. * You need a different set of columns for a chunk of work. * Ownership or cadence is different, for example daily docketing vs monthly reporting. * The audience or confidentiality needs are different. **Signal** * If half your rows leave several columns blank, you are mixing processes. Split the table. --- ## Decision tree, three quick questions Use this quick framework to decide where an item belongs. This is the same principle used in task management software, adapted for legal workflows. 1. Is this a list of similar items over time, or a discrete phase of the matter * Yes. Create a Workstream. 2. Can it be overdue by itself, and does it need an owner * Yes. Create a Task. 3. Is it a step to finish a Task and not tracked on its own * Yes. Create a Step. --- ## Common mistakes to avoid Many project management failures come from overdesigning or misusing the structure. Avoid these mistakes to keep your Workstreams lean and effective. * Wide tables with many optional columns. Keep it to eight or fewer. * Two columns for the same idea, for example Status and Phase that overlap. Merge or define clearly. * More than one approval gate when one would do. It slows work and confuses owners. * Mixing unrelated processes in one table, for example signatures and invoice approvals. --- ## Build your first Workstream Building a Workstream is like setting up a project board. Keep it light, pilot it, then refine. Lupl is designed to let you do this quickly without heavy admin work. 1. Write the Workstream purpose in one sentence. 2. Add the Core 5 columns. 3. Add at most three Helpers you will use. 4. Define clear Status meanings in plain words. 5. Set defaults for any value that repeats on most rows, for example Jurisdiction. 6. Add two light automations, a due soon reminder and an overdue nudge. 7. Pilot for one week and adjust. --- ## Where this fits in legal project management Use these principles to standardize project management for lawyers across matters. Keep structures consistent. Reuse column sets and status definitions. Your team will find work faster, reduce follow ups, and close loops on time. --- ### On page SEO helpers * Suggested title tag. Lupl Workstream Design Principles, Practical Legal Project Management for Lawyers * Suggested meta description. Learn how to design lean Lupl Workstreams for legal project management. Get clear rules for Tasks, Steps, statuses, and columns to run matters with confidence. * Suggested URL slug. legal-project-management-for-lawyers-workstream-design

      Lupl Workstream Design Principles: A Practical Guide to Legal Project Management for Lawyers

      Learn why large‑firm lawyers are ditching Excel checklists for dynamic,...

      Do AI Agents Have An Identity? Notes from InfoSec Discussions

      Agentic AI is in its early phases but advancing fast....