article-time-estimate-icon

4 minute read

Why Be a Lighthouse When You Can Be a Candle?

Ab Saraswat

Ab Saraswat

Why Be a Candle When You Can Be a Lighthouse LPM Webinar
In this article

    Lupl recently hosted the “Illuminating the Path with LPM webinar, featuring a panel of experts from across the legal field. The panelists included Ericka Davis, Legal Project Manager at EDP Renewables, Trisha Wright, Project Coordinator at DecisionQuest, and India Preston, Director of Platforms Solutions at Lupl. Guiding this discussion was Kalina Leopold, Lupl’s Director of Growth.

    The webinar covered three key topics: exploring how legal professionals already integrate LPM into their daily routines (but may not know it), strategies for leveling up one’s LPM skills, and the significant impact of LPM on profitability. The panelists then shared practical best practices that can be implemented immediately. The session concluded with an engaging Q&A session, allowing attendees to raise questions to the panelists and delve deeper into LPM. Here is a recap of the conversation:

    How You May Already Be Using LPM

    The first topic discussed in the webinar focused on recognizing how LPM principles are already at play within various legal contexts. The panelists highlighted that anyone within the legal industry who invests time in creating and improving processes is essentially thinking like a project manager. LPM has become increasingly important as clients seek cost-conscious and efficient legal services. By applying project management principles to legal work, firms and departments can enhance efficiencies, reduce costs, and ultimately provide better outcomes for their clients.

    How You Can Level Up Your LPM

    The next topic delved into strategies for enhancing LPM skills and capabilities. The panelists kicked off the discussion by highlighting key distinctions between standard project management and legal project management. Ericka emphasized that while project management is a universal concept applicable to various industries, LPM requires adapting general project management principles into specific techniques tailored for the legal sector, using specialized management tools, and collaborating among legal professionals and various departments to achieve project goals.

    Hopefully by implementing and applying project management principles to legal work, law firms, law departments, ALSPs can improve efficiencies, reduce costs and deliver better outcomes for their stakeholders and clients.

    Ericka Davis

    Trisha added that legal professionals, including lawyers, often perform legal project management tasks without formal terminology or processes. However, a more structured and nuanced approach is needed to optimize these practices. This involves implementing change management strategies, embracing softer skills, and being flexible, key skill sets when it comes to managing legal projects that attorneys may not have.

    India underscored the importance of Legal Project Managers by sharing how, when setting up LPM teams for law firms, she saw opportunities to bring a new perspective and make processes more effective.

    The panelists further highlighted the different skill sets that are needed with legal projects. As LPMs continue to increase their knowledge and upskill, they transition from being a candle with a smaller impact to a lighthouse, acting as a guiding light. India noted that individuals can make this progression in their career by continually asking ‘why’ when it comes to processes and challenging the status quo.

    Don’t be content to take on old ways of working. You’re taking on someone else’s bad habits. Innovate – make it new, make it yours. Ask a thousand questions, be curious. Question it, doubt it, break it up and put it back together again.

    India Preston

    How LPM Affects Profitability

    This segment explored LPM’s impact on profitability within law firms and legal service providers. The discussion revolved around the concept that improving LPM practices leads to increased efficiency, which, in turn, enhances profitability. India emphasized that improved legal project management will lead directly to higher efficiencies. With more experience, LPMs can have more control over the work process and take on more work without a corresponding increase in stress.

    The panelists underscored that efficient LPM practices enable professionals to charge competitive service rates and reduce write-offs. Legal organizations can make informed decisions that drive profitability by closely tracking metrics, analyzing data, and leveraging technology. Overall, there is a need for continuous learning and the integration of LPM principles into legal workflows to stay competitive and profitable in the evolving legal landscape.

    We’re not just doing this just to create more work. We’re trying to get to where we’re highly efficient. Where if you work for a law firm or ALSP, we’re able to bring in more clients, take on more complex work.

    Trisha Wright

    Best Practices

    The panelists concluded the webinar by sharing their best practices in LPM. With their wealth of experience in this space, the panelists each offered valuable insights and actionable tips to the audience.

    First, Trisha urged the audience to streamline their approach by picking one project management system and dedicating their efforts to it. She emphasized that whether it’s implementing a sophisticated software solution or something as simple as maintaining a well-organized Excel spreadsheet, consistency is key.

    Ericka emphasized the critical role of effective communication as her recommendation. She outlined three key points: clarifying project objectives and scope early to ensure alignment, using project kickoff meetings to set expectations and roles, and regularly communicating with clients, preventing last-minute issues and setbacks by addressing problems early in the project. She highlighted the essential nature of open and consistent communication in successful legal project management.

    India’s best practice recommendation centered on embracing discomfort as a pathway to growth and innovation. She encouraged not settling for comfort as it often indicates missed opportunities and urged the audience to avoid adopting outdated methods and instead innovate and personalize their approaches. She also emphasized the importance of curiosity, questioning, and experimentation, encouraging individuals to break things down and reconstruct them.

    Conclusion

    This webinar provided invaluable insights into how LPM can transform practices and workflows in the legal industry. With expert panelists like Trisha, Ericka, and India sharing their knowledge, we explored key concepts such as differentiation between standard and legal project management, the impact of LPM on profitability, and powerful best practices.

    In October, Lupl will be featured in an ILTA Product Briefing, discussing how we’re transforming task management! Whether you’re part of a small or large law firm, Lupl streamlines tasks, deadlines, and collaboration. Our matter-specific templates automate workflows, making legal projects more efficient. Elevate your firm’s performance across practice areas – register for our next webinar today!

    In this article

      More legal tech insights we think you'll love

      The cost of over-dependence on AI

      AI saves us time, boosts productivity, and lets us do...

      # Lupl Workstream Design Principles: A Practical Guide to Legal Project Management for Lawyers Legal project management works when your setup is simple, ownership is clear, and statuses are unambiguous. This guide shows how to turn existing processes and checklists into a lean, reliable Workstream. Lupl is the legal project management platform for law firms, making it easy and intuitive to apply these principles. It also supports moving your work from Excel, Word tables, or if you are transitioning from Microsoft Planner, Smartsheet, or Monday. You will learn what belongs in a Workstream, a Task, or a Step, and which columns to use. If you want practical project management for lawyers, start here. **Excerpt:** Legal project management works when ownership, dates, and statuses are clear. This guide shows lawyers how to turn checklists into Lupl Workstreams with the right columns, Tasks, and Steps. Use it to standardize project management for lawyers, reduce follow ups, and move matters to done. --- ## How to organize your work with Workstreams, Tasks, and Steps Workstreams, Tasks, and Steps are three different types of objects in Lupl. They form a simple hierarchy. Workstreams contain Tasks. Tasks may contain optional Steps. This hierarchy aligns with standard project management. In project management, you break work into projects, deliverables, and subtasks. Lupl adapts this for lawyers by using Workstreams, Tasks, and Steps. This makes it easier to map legal processes to a structure that teams can track and manage. * **Workstream.** Use when you have many similar or related items to track over time. Think of the Workstream as the table. * Examples: closing checklist, court deadlines, pretrial preparation, regulatory obligations, due diligence, local counsel management. * **Task.** A high level unit of legal work. A key deliverable with an owner and a due date. Tasks are the rows. * Examples: File motion. Prepare Shareholder Agreement. Submit Q3 report. * **Step.** An optional short checklist inside a single Task. Steps roll up to the parent Task. * Examples: Draft. QC. Partner review. E file. Serve. ### Quick test * If it can be overdue by itself, make it a Task. * If it only helps complete a Task, make it a Step. * If you need different columns or owners, create a separate Workstream. --- ## Do you need to track everything in Lupl Not every detail needs to be tracked in a project management system. The principle is to capture what drives accountability and progress. In Lupl, that means focusing on deliverables, not every micro action. * Use the level of detail you would bring to a weekly team meeting agenda. * Position Tasks as key deliverables. Treat Steps as optional micro tasks to show progress. * Example: You need client instructions. Do not add a Task for "Email client to request a call." Just make the call. If the client approves a key deliverable on the call, mark that item Approved in Lupl so the team has visibility. --- ## Start with the Core 5 columns Columns are the backbone of a Workstream. They define what information is tracked for each Task. In project management terms, these are your core metadata fields. They keep everyone aligned without overcomplicating the table. Keep the table narrow. You can add later. These five work across most legal project management use cases. 1. **Title.** Start with a verb. Example: File answer to complaint. 2. **Status.** Five to seven clear choices. Example: Not started, In progress, For review, For approval, Done. 3. **Assignee.** One named owner per row. If you add multiple assignees for collaboration, still name a primary owner. 4. **Due date.** One date per row. 5. **Type or Category.** Show different kinds of work in one table. Example: Filing, Discovery, Signature, Approval. **Priority.** Add only if you actively triage by priority each week. If added, keep it simple: High, Medium, Low. --- ## Add up to three Helper columns Lupl includes a set of pre made columns you can use out of the box. These allow you to customize Workstreams around different phases or stages of a matter. They also let you map how you already track transactional work, litigation, or other processes. Helper columns are optional fields that add context. In task management, these are similar to tags or attributes you use to sort and filter work. The key is to only add what you will update and use. Pick only what you will use. Stop when you reach three. * Party or Counterparty * Jurisdiction or Court * Phase * Approver * Approval, status or yes or no * Signature status * Risk, RAG * Amount or Number * External ID or Client ID * Document or Link * Docket number * Client entity **Guidance** * For Task Workstreams, prefer Approver, Approval, Risk. The rest are more common in Custom Workstreams. * Aim for eight columns or fewer in your main table. Put detail in the Task description, attachments, or Steps. --- ## Simple rules that keep your table clean Consistency is critical in project management. A cluttered or inconsistent table slows teams down. These rules ensure your Workstream remains usable and clear. * Only add a column people will update during the matter. If it never changes, set a default at the Workstream level or set a default value in the column. * Only add a column you will sort or filter on. If you will not use it to find or group work, leave it out. * If a value changes inside one Task, use Steps. Steps show progress without widening the table. * Keep columns short and structured. Use Description for brief context or instructions. Use Task comments for discussion and decisions. Link to work product in your DMS as the source of truth. * One accountable owner per Task and one due date. You can add collaborators, but always name a primary owner who moves the Task. If different people or dates apply to different parts, split into separate Tasks or capture the handoff as Steps. * Add automations after you lock the design. Finalize columns and status definitions first. Then add simple reminders and escalations that read those fields. --- ## Status hygiene that everyone understands Status is the single most important column in project management. It tells the team where the work stands. Too many options cause confusion. Too few cause misalignment. In Lupl, keep it simple and consistent. * Five to seven statuses are enough. * Use one review gate, For review or For approval. Use both only if your process needs two gates. * One terminal status, Done. This is the end state of the Task. Use Archived only if you report on it or need it for retention workflows. --- ## When to split into multiple Workstreams In project management, it is best practice to separate workstreams when workflows, owners, or audiences diverge. Lupl makes this easy by letting you create multiple Workstreams for one matter. Create a new Workstream if any of the following are true. * You need a different set of columns for a chunk of work. * Ownership or cadence is different, for example daily docketing vs monthly reporting. * The audience or confidentiality needs are different. **Signal** * If half your rows leave several columns blank, you are mixing processes. Split the table. --- ## Decision tree, three quick questions Use this quick framework to decide where an item belongs. This is the same principle used in task management software, adapted for legal workflows. 1. Is this a list of similar items over time, or a discrete phase of the matter * Yes. Create a Workstream. 2. Can it be overdue by itself, and does it need an owner * Yes. Create a Task. 3. Is it a step to finish a Task and not tracked on its own * Yes. Create a Step. --- ## Common mistakes to avoid Many project management failures come from overdesigning or misusing the structure. Avoid these mistakes to keep your Workstreams lean and effective. * Wide tables with many optional columns. Keep it to eight or fewer. * Two columns for the same idea, for example Status and Phase that overlap. Merge or define clearly. * More than one approval gate when one would do. It slows work and confuses owners. * Mixing unrelated processes in one table, for example signatures and invoice approvals. --- ## Build your first Workstream Building a Workstream is like setting up a project board. Keep it light, pilot it, then refine. Lupl is designed to let you do this quickly without heavy admin work. 1. Write the Workstream purpose in one sentence. 2. Add the Core 5 columns. 3. Add at most three Helpers you will use. 4. Define clear Status meanings in plain words. 5. Set defaults for any value that repeats on most rows, for example Jurisdiction. 6. Add two light automations, a due soon reminder and an overdue nudge. 7. Pilot for one week and adjust. --- ## Where this fits in legal project management Use these principles to standardize project management for lawyers across matters. Keep structures consistent. Reuse column sets and status definitions. Your team will find work faster, reduce follow ups, and close loops on time. --- ### On page SEO helpers * Suggested title tag. Lupl Workstream Design Principles, Practical Legal Project Management for Lawyers * Suggested meta description. Learn how to design lean Lupl Workstreams for legal project management. Get clear rules for Tasks, Steps, statuses, and columns to run matters with confidence. * Suggested URL slug. legal-project-management-for-lawyers-workstream-design

      Lupl Workstream Design Principles: A Practical Guide to Legal Project Management for Lawyers

      Learn why large‑firm lawyers are ditching Excel checklists for dynamic,...

      Do AI Agents Have An Identity? Notes from InfoSec Discussions

      Agentic AI is in its early phases but advancing fast....